Original, Originality, et al.

About This Blog

I like writing (read Typing) and here's my attempt to put up my opinion about non/important things and aspects of non/human issues.

This is the detailed blog. Alternatively, you can check the RSS Feed and also Subscribe to receive update on my Blog via Email.

At this point, there aren't any keywords or topics I target to write about. Do drop in your comments/suggestions on how I could make this place look better. Or simply email to me.

Got 10 Seconds?

I love my blog. You love your blog. But do 'you' love 'my' blog? *




Subscribe by Email

Your email:


Rahul Desai's Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Original, Originality, et al.

Posted by Rahul Desai on Mon, Dec 06, 2010
 

How to produce/create original content? As an armature blogger, like millions others, I must know the answer to this burning question.

In my recent conversation with someone very close and frank to me, I got an honest feedback that my last few articles weren’t so charismatic as she had expected. I can’t blame her. I was so indulged in urge to write something – absolutely anything to start with. I partially (or fully?) failed to justify the topic. But what else could I have possibly written?

I have picked information from forwarded emails, anonymous quotes, newspapers and books to write inspired articles, in the past. Many of them were gladly received, read and commented on. But did I really deserve that? At least I wasn’t satisfied. And when I managed to break out of the shell, it had a direct and tougher competition with my own writing of the past.

In fact, it didn’t exactly start there. A few more days earlier, on our way back from work we happened to discuss how tough it must be for the music composers to come up with new-harmonic-catchy tunes every time. And so for the lyricists, to write something new, acceptable and still commercial. Advertisers, to come up with conditionally creativity that can sell.

Thinking in the same line, there are a billion blogs out there in the wild today. (Considering 200 Million, that someone counted in 2005.) Not that they’re in competition with one another, but it’s an obvious wish/attempt to write something better than others. Newer material. Something that has never been written before. Something Original.

Talking of myself, it’s never easy for me to part from this attitude of picking ‘trending’ topics and writing-patterns that ‘work’. I refer ten websites to confirm what I’m writing is correct/valid, and most usually, my freedom of omni-directional thoughts is killed brutally. Unfortunately, it’s usually goes unnoticed. If I were allowed to generalize, we as Indians are basically more used to references – proven, successful models. Our work-culture, television, music and reality shows, usually are influenced. (I just can’t overlook the fact how my favourite Sarabhai vs. Sarabhai is inspired from Everybody Loves Raymond.) We’re fine and welcoming to Indian counterparts of American shows (American Idol, Millionaire, etc). It’s not a crime, agreed. But is it really so tough to come up with something original? On the same time, is it really wrong/bad not being original?

Coming to blogging, writing original/fresh/new content or an original topic has always been challenging. One reason being, we (I?) often link originality to exclusivity which in turn leads to copyrights, and other repulsive words like that. And just then I realized the ‘secret’!

The ‘trick’ lies in the ‘individuality’. Originality is Individuality.

Calvin on Originality

While they can be influenced/inspired by other content, the individuality remains. It’s the individual view/opinion/thought that’s unseen, unheard before. If I decide to write about Blackberry (the gadget), the key is my opinion - that combined with Blackberry makes an original-unique combination.

Originality is all about the beauty of uniqueness, that it’s constant in itself. The blogs, topics and readers may be finite. But when it comes to combining them with individuality opinions, things go beyond counting and computing. Probably that’s the business model ‘Information’ or ‘Content’ industry runs on. I wonder if Mashable.com ever discusses/writes about any of their inventions. And still over two million ‘followers’ look forward to their twits – for something ‘new’. Original?

Evidently, I didn’t mean to convey any message or prove a point with this article. I recently completed five years of blogging through rahuldesai.com and little over that, of blogging in general. I'm just attempting to grow. I meant to address a thought through this article and still remain original (if not amusing).

It remains an open forum and I’m looking forward to discuss/receive comments/inputs.

  Like this blog? Consider following rahuldesai.com on Facebook.

Tags: ,

COMMENTS

Rahul, 
I could not infer one thing from the above write up and that is are you trying to criticize plagiarism or just trying to put across a fact that plagiarism with an intended purpose if done neatly can be masked as evolution. 
As for the sited examples of TV shows this isn't something related to TV shows, music, plays, stories or movies what we "do" "eat" "wear" "drive" "talk"... and more relative here in this context "write" everything could be referred as plagiarized.  
Most importantly what are the factors which govern these things... i would continue with this in short time.... thanks for putting point put across!

posted @ Monday, December 06, 2010 10:15 PM by VAIBHAV GOSWAMI


Mots, 
 
‘Plagiarism’ is really a big term, big enough to be discussed independently. As you rightly pointed, I was trying to portray that somewhere plagiarism (of some extent) adds to the evolution. We can anyways not mention ‘plagiarism’ as independent from ‘originality’. Although, the opposite isn’t necessarily true.  
 
The TV example was more relevant to our mentality to accept and prefer none-original (though, not plagiarized) things. We allow and include such things normally in our life, rather than challenging oneself to come up with something different.  
 
Still, this article is just a collection of thoughts that came to my mind, many contradicting to others. Article isn’t a conclusion, it’s an attempt to discuss the topic. (Conclusion is completely optional.)  

posted @ Tuesday, December 07, 2010 3:38 AM by Rahul Desai


I think the article you have initiated thats an original thought. As you rightly said , I always refer google before putting my thought in front. I am not sure but according to me if from those references we are coming out with one concrete thought - that is so original.I can simply say , for instance you inspired me about the matter , but whatever I am writing about is of course an unique , individual thought from within - I guess you can say in simple words "original". However , in terms of lyrics , shows - they get inspiration to write, produce from everything around the world only. This is not conclusion , this is what I think !

posted @ Tuesday, December 07, 2010 2:54 PM by Twinkle Parmar


Beloved Rahul, 
 
I liked your desire to write Original,Originality,et al. 
 
I read the article once and then again. 
 
I think writing inspired thoughts following particular reading /viewing can also be original if the reference is quoted of the previous information. 
 
What one feels following reading some views 
 
here and there are one’s own. 
 
Well,only real original one can be telling one’s own story---autobiography…very little number of people are interested in knowing that. 
 
Pappa

posted @ Wednesday, December 08, 2010 12:02 AM by Bharat Desai


Nice, its difficult i guess to bring out an original content, but though ur writing have been really fresh and specific to the topic ...

posted @ Wednesday, December 08, 2010 2:25 AM by Shivang Patel


Liked your article Original, Originality, et al. and have always liked all your blogs as they are very simple and through the point – subject. And yes, Originality is Individuality.

posted @ Friday, December 10, 2010 2:51 AM by Vaishali


@Twinkle: Thank you for appreciating my effort. I guess I’ve just managed to point of many things most of us do, as humans. I completely agree with you on the ‘reference’ part. I believe Pappa has also pointed the same thing. If something has inspired about a matter/topic, what you write about it on your own still remains original. Again, it’s the individuality and uniqueness, when combined make original idea/view.  
@Vaibhav: I’m still waiting for more inputs from your end.  

posted @ Monday, December 13, 2010 7:24 AM by Rahul Desai


@Pappa: I agree. One’s opinions/views/feelings following some other ‘original’ content is also ‘original’. And the reference to the other source should be fine, as far as it’s within acceptable limits. Although it’s a relative term, I feel excessive reference or mention of other’s work/content usually kills the ‘originality’.  
 
While it may or maynot be completely original, it remains more ‘sellable’ or ‘popular’. There’s better possibility of readers preferring this over some other ‘completely original’ but less interesting topics. Autobiography is a perfect example you’ve put. I once started reading ‘Wings of Fire’ – Dr Abdul Kalam’s autobiography, mainly out of respect for his great work. Apparently I lost the interest within a few chapters and gave up somewhere midway.  
 
I guess the combination of Originality and Reference is cyclic (and symbiotic).  
 
@Shivang: I’m glad you like my writing.  
 
@Ben: Thank you for your encouragement! I’ll try my best to keep writing, and keep improving.  

posted @ Monday, December 13, 2010 7:45 AM by Rahul Desai


As promised, read your article again with a different thought process and yes i feel like commenting again :-). In our lives mostly people like original well some do it for sure and some fake it to perfection, having said this i believe there is nothing wrong in liking something not so original ("Sarabhai..." in your case). But my question here though is that where exactly can i look for something really original. The reason for this being our tendencies, choices, the way we are brought up and so on... 
However the thumb rule is that 'Original' does not implies meaningful, sensible, productive and interesting hence originality itself needs to have so many filters to register its mere existence. Whats ur take?

posted @ Monday, December 05, 2011 3:16 AM by VAIBHAV GOSWAMI


@Mots: Quite a valid point. The interest in original entity (genuinely or otherwise) is only one aspect of the very existence of 'original' things - 'content' in this case.  
 
Do we really want 'original' content? As you rightly pointed, is original always the best or the most meaningful? What's wrong in liking 'not-so-original' content?  
 
And then, this other thought of 'pleasing others' came to my mind. How often than not do we do things (in this case, write articles) to please others (- attract more readers). And if not-so-original content does the justice to the requirement, gets me the raise in readers I need, gives my readers the content they like munching, in my opinion it should be considered as the ‘right’ thing to do. 
 
But of course, your question remains – what filters and qualifies something to be original, and how significant its existence would be?! 

posted @ Tuesday, December 20, 2011 9:56 AM by Rahul Desai


Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Got 10 seconds? Please fill this quick "10 Seconds form" and let me know about your blog too.

Flag Counter